Our problems spring not from communist conspiracies, Jewish world plots, Illuminati, blacks, or Bilderbergers, but rather from the very institutions that right wing conservative patriots are trying so desperately to protect and defend. Conservatives would have us believe that we can save our civilization by simply allowing resegregation of the more "favored races"* and less "favored races"* or by returning to the ideas of fundamentalist religion and ancient political dogma like the 'Declaration of Independence'. Actually, we could run our government and our society today with the tenets of the 'Declaration of Independence' and fundamentalist religion just about as easily as we could drive an 18th century carriage to the moon. The statement that "all men are created equal" is enshrined in our heart next to E equals MC2 when it should be catalogued next to 'break a mirror and get 7 years bad luck'. Equality is man's most dangerous myth. All men do not have an equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Only the ethical, moral and law abiding have a right to liberty; only the productive and creative have a right to life; and only the wise have a right to the pursuit of happiness.
Democracy is the Ouija board theory of government. |
Democracy is the Ouija board theory of government. If a leading scientist was stumped with a problem and wanted to know the answer to a complicated question of mathematics, chemistry or physics, would he take a poll of the opinions of those on the street? No! Why then would a governmental leader? Are governmental decisions somehow less critical to the progress of man and civilization than scientific ones? Or, do the rabble have some innate sense of social problems that the scientist does not? Suppose you wanted to fly to the moon? Would you take a poll of the people in the street and ask them what components they thought would be necessary to incorporate in a space ship? If we did, what is the probability that we would ever get there? Why should the people in the street know more about politics than they do about aerodynamics? Why then do we ask the man on the street to vote on the components that he thinks are necessary to establish an efficient workable social economic structure? For a politician to implore all the people to vote however they feel on election day is like asking a monkey to throw sand into the mechanism of Apollo 11 before it takes off. If we are to survive as a species, we must give rule to the few who think rather than to the many who merely fornicate. Numbers and fertility do not imply a divine right to rule.
We recognize that there are some people who should not be permitted to vote and interfere in the decisions that will determine the destiny of man, which is why we prohibit felons from voting. Perhaps we should extend that prohibition to include imbeciles and 10th generation welfare recipients?
Mindless slogans like 'white power' actually make it more difficult for us to understand the real philosophical and political dilemma of the 21st century. |
It would be a fatal error to think that our deeply flawed society could be saved by so simple an expedient as the mere segregation or expulsion of some troublesome national or ethnic groups. Mindless slogans like 'white power' actually make it more difficult for us to understand the real philosophical and political dilemma of the 21st century. No matter what the racial makeup of the population, the tyranny of the lowest socio-biologic class in our lysenkoist democratic political institutions will destroy us because our institutions give power to the most numerous and least capable people who can simply vote the money and power away from the capable and competent working people. If this is allowed to continue, there will eventually be a dysgenic decline in the population until the point is reached when the poor, incompetent low IQ people on welfare of whatever "race"* outnumber the superior socio-biologic class of working people so much that they will no longer be able to maintain society or support the lower class. At that point, riots, mass starvation and famine would reduce the population in an inhumane manner. Only Eugenics, not segregation could prevent this from happening.
The presence of more "favored races"* and less "favored races"* in our society can actually serve as a positive political advantage to the eugenic movement because it destroys the myth of equality and brings into question governments and political institutions based on that myth. The vast difference in the record of historical performance and anatomy between the more "favored races"* and the less "favored races"* is so dramatic that the real inequality of all men is dramatically demonstrated: The lesson one must draw from this is that if more "favored races"* and the less "favored races"* are innately unequal, might not other groups and classes within the same "race"* also be unequal? If the population were composed of only one "race"*, it might be more difficult to demonstrate the political need to recognize the fact of inequality and to deal with this reality by implementing a eugenic program. If we treat all people as though they were equal, the quality, ability and productivity of each succeeding generation will decline until we reach the point at which we can not maintain civilization at all.
Expulsion of all less "favored races"* from America or Europe would not prevent this collapse; it would merely postpone it. Ironically, the more members of the lower socio-biologic class and the less "favored race"* that immigrate into the U.S. and Europe, the quicker and more dramatic will be the collapse of civilization and therefore the greater the political pressure that could be funneled into the eugenic movement. If a conservative political group like the KKK were to expel the immigrants, that might prevent the rapid building up of the political pressure that would be necessary to bring the eugenic movement to power. This would be a pyrrhic victory because in the end the civilization would still collapse because of dysgenic policy.
Because of the presence of more "favored races"* and less "favored races"* in Europe and America, we have practically a prewritten historical script to force the eugenic movement to power: Because if we continue out present dysgenic immigration and welfare policies, our standard of living and our civilization itself must quickly decline and disappear. Consider the situation in Europe and America today. We have a population composed of a mixture of more "favored races"* and less "favored races"* which are increasingly voting as a block within a political system which dispenses power and resources based on counting the number of votes and at the same time the less "favored races"* are increasing in numbers and political power much faster than the more "favored races"*. It is clear that such a society must theoretically destroy itself when the members of the lower socio-biologic class and the less "favored races"* become so numerous that they can no longer be maintained: But at the same time, they can not be thrown off within the context of a lysenkoist democratic tyranny based on one man one vote. Such a society (a lysenkoist democratic tyranny) must either destroy itself of develop a political system which gives power to people based on ability rather than numbers. Only the eugenic movement can offer such a formula.
If things continue on their present course, at some point, the more "favored races"* must either surrender their civilization, their standard of living and everything that their ancestors built up over thousands of years or break the political power of the less "favored races"* and lower socio-biologic class. It is not in human psychology to allow this to happen: When people see their civilization and standard of living disappearing, they will be motivated to take action. Only the eugenic movement provides a meaningful, just and practical means through which they can take action to preserve civilization and still treat everyone fairly without regard to "race"*. If the eugenic movement is unable to prevent the coming dysgenic disaster, there are two possibilities for Europe and America. Either the political economic system will collapse and even civilization itself will disappear or else the political system will be taken over by the working people of the superior socio-biologic class of the more "favored race"* by revolution or political activism. Given human nature and the frontier history of the US, the latter course seems much more likely despite the opposition of the media and the apparent quiescence of the middle class today.
A eugenic society offers a system by which each individual could be judged on the basis of individual merit. |
In either case, the human race is not saved from dysgenic decline nor does any ultimate benefit accrue to our progeny in the long run. Even if our population were as white as Hitler's behind, our lysenkoist political institutions would still destroy our society. Also there would be an injustice committed as well as a loss of efficiency if a superior member of a less "favored race"*, (say a scientist) were expelled and a retarded member of a more "favored race"* was retained. A eugenic society offers a system by which each individual could be judged on the basis of individual merit. Obviously, new immigration would have to stop or be restricted to the best individuals. There would be no point to a eugenic society with open borders. If we implemented a universal eugenic program for our whole population, we could avoid racial war and avoid establishing a historical precedent of judging people by their physical appearance.
Racial injustice occurs whenever a person is given something or denied something solely because of his "race"*. Within the context of a political eugenic movement, more "favored races"* could just insist that they be given equal opportunity for a job or education based on individual merit without reference to birth rate or numerical representation and less "favored races"* could insist that they be judged on the basis of individual merit without reference to the average of the group to which they happen to belong. In arbitrating and adjudicating the competing claims of less "favored races"* and more "favored races"* the eugenic movement could gain a position of political prominence and become a permanent part of the philosophical, political and religious structure of the human race. This could rebound to the benefit of all the children who will ever be born in all the centuries that will ever be because only the eugenic movement could accept the moral responsibility to protect the right of the children of the future to be born physically healthy and mentally capable. Once in power, the eugenic movement could recognize the importance of socio-biologic class and implement a program of affirmative action eugenics that would protect and improve the genetic health of our children so that hundreds of generations from now our children's children might be as highly evolved above us as we are above a monkey.
Our problems are not caused by an identifiable racial, national or political group, but by the very institutions which form the basic framework of our society itself. Even if all blacks, Mexicans, Jews or the entire population of Des Moines Iowa were removed from the United States or Europe, the faulty institutions, religious, philosophical, economic and political that actually caused the problem would still be in place. Mere racism might serve as effective political theater, a tactic to gain political power, but in and of itself, it serves no purpose unless it is combined with a revolution in though which places evolutionary ethics firmly in power and removes the antiquated fundamentalist notions of religion, politics and economics which are the real cause of our problem.
We have been struggling for a thousand years before the pyramids to have life and labor recognized as the center and focus and the fulcrum of the universe through which every thing is seen and understood and done. Are we going to quit now because a scientist did a statistical study showing that we are not all equal? Is this a surprise?
The old lysenoist myth that the races and classes are equal caused the collapse of the worker's government in Russia and will soon have the same effect in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Clearly, the proletariat is composed of less "favored races" and less favored socio biological classes. It should surprise non one that these worthless bums from the slum couldn't tie their own shoes, let alone run the government. But to the wrong way corrigans of the right it was an earth shaking revelation that proved to them beyond a shadow of a doubt that the priests, kings and usurers truly did have a divine right to command the resources of the earth and the destiny of man. In their glee that communism was gone and the evil empire kaput, the wrong way corrigans of the right joyfully gave billions to entrepreneurs in Russia, never noticing that they are exactly the same people who wore red stars yesterday.
The status of the workers, which in the lexicon of the third way, means those who maintain the society, hasn't changed a jot. The lysenkoist communists repeat the litany that priests, kings and usurers are parasites on the back of life and labor. The lysenkoist capitalists respond with the mantra that the proletariat is a parasite on the back of the hard working and capable element of the population. And you know, they're both right. Capitalism, communism and fundamentalism are the twin sisters of slavery and oppression. In either case, a small cartel of plutocrats control and direct the destiny of the workers without regard to the best interests of the workers. What difference does it make whether those controlling plutocrats call themselves trilateralists, bilderbergers, the politburo of the supreme soviet, the federal reserve board of the council of nicea?
Ironically, communism is actually higher on the scale of cultural evolution than fundamentalism because the classes described by communism do actually exist, although they are misunderstood, but the ghosts and goblins described by fundamentalism do not exist. Even Dr. Shockley agreed with me on that.
Two hundred years ago, my ancestors fought to free the workers from the tyranny of King George III. The workers laughed when the king held up a crown and sceptre and claimed that these pieces of stone and metal endowed him with the divine right to tax the workers for the sun that shines and the rain that falls. Why do the workers cower today when Rothschild and Rockefeller hold up a dollar and a ruple and claim that these pieces of paper that they inherited when they were born give them the divine right to control the resources of the earth and the destiny of man? Why do the workers cower today when the popes and the ayatollahs holdl up a book and claim that they have a divine right to rule because they have an autographed picture of God on their desk?
For a thousand years before the pyramids, we have fought the wars and built the castles and paid the usury to those who claimed the divine right of crowns and sceptres and dollars and ruples and books. What about the divine right of the workers who dared to trudge across the glacier to find food for their children, the workers who cleared the forests and plowed the fields and built the pyramids? I assure you workers, the only divine right that anyone has is the divine right to work. I promise you workers that if you stop paying tribute to the priests, kings and usurers, the sun will still rise tomorrow and the rain will still fall. And when you plow a field or build a house, it will be for your children. Workers outnumber priests, kings and usureres 10,000 to one. When we clear out minds of their illusions, we can vote anything we want. Tomorrow belongs to us.
*'Origin of Species', Charles Darwin.