An open letter to the U.S. Congress:

I recently placed the enclosed ad in several newspapers, magazines and web Internet sites in several countries around the world, including North America, Europe, etc. As you will note from the ad, I offer a free copy of the "Eugenic Manifesto", (see enclosure) to those who write and ask for one. I received a surprising number of requests for the book from people who were in prison. Often as not, these people claim to be political prisoners. That is, that they were imprisoned for their political beliefs, not because they committed a criminal act. I understand that the Lysenkoist Democratic Tyrannies in Europe, notably Germany, France and England and the European Union, have passed Orwellian Thought Crime laws which make the expression of certain ideas in print or some other form illegal and that many thousands of people including notably Gerhard Lauck of the USA, have been imprisoned merely because of the ideas they express. While there might be an altruistic motivation behind the passage of such laws, to prevent the incitement of violence and racial hatred, there is also an undesirable side effect, the prevention of reasoned and open discussion of the problems that the human family faces. The same law which put Gerhard Lauck in prison would put Charles Darwin in prison. If Charles Darwin wrote his book today, he'd be rooming with Gerhard. Once again, it seems, the human family must learn the old adage, "The end does not justify the means." The way to defeat totalitarianism is not to censor books like Darwin's "Origin of Species", which has already happened to a great extent. Even in the USA uncensored copies of "Origin of the Species are generally not available in bookstores. I had to go to the library to find an old uncensored copy. The way to defeat totalitarianism is not to censor books, but to tell the truth. The recognition of the fact that the races are unequal does not signal the end of civilization, although the denial of that fact might. Does the recognition of the fact that siblings are unequal signal the end of the family unit? As I pointed out in the excerpt above from the "Eugenic Manifesto", the recognition of the fact of inequality does not preclude fair treatment.

My question is: If I do go to Denmark, Europe or Germany, will I be rooming with Gerhard because I included in my book, "Eugenic Manifesto" the uncensored subtitle of Darwin's "Origin of Species", "On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life"?

Please consider the negative effect that Orwellian thought crime laws have on free scientific discussion. The names of historians, scientists and nobel prize winners who could be imprisoned under these laws reads like the roster of the best minds we have: Charles Darwin, David Irving, Dr. Shockley, Raymond Cattell, etc. These laws agains free inquiry and open discussion cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. Any help you can render in this matter is greatly appreciated.

An open letter to Gerhard Lauck:

Although Charles Darwin and I would both be considered racist by the Lysenkoist democratic tyrannies in Washington, Paris, Bonn and London, we in the eugenic movement do not accept the half science and half truth of the KKK and Nazis. The fact that the races are unequal is true, as far as it goes, but the KKK and Nazis want to stop there with half the truth. We in the eugenic movement, like Paul Harvey, want to tell "the rest of the story". You won't find it in "Mein Kampf" nor, I suspect, in the naturalization procedure for the KKK; but in "Eugenic Manifesto" I wrote: "Eugenics is a moral commitment not a racial affiliation and any "race" that adopted a eugenic program could, given sufficient time, evolve into and become the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens. It is our hope that all "races" will accept that moral responsibility and accomplish that objective, but it cannot be accomplished within the political, philosophical and religious milieu of the 20th century." This is a critical difference between the whole truth of the eugenic movement and the half truth of the KKK and Nazis, because the threat does not come from blacks, Mexicans, Jews or Chinese, but rather from the very political and religious institutions that right wing conservative patriots are trying so desperately to protect and defend. If any race accepts the moral responsibility to protect the mental and physical health of its children, then that race will become the next more highly evolved species above Homo Sapiens. And here is the real question before us, a moral question: are we responsible for the destiny of man and the universe? The conservatives, like Pat Buchanan, answer that question in the negative and so do the liberals.

If man is responsible for the rain forest, the spotted owl and the snail darter, does he not have at least and equal responsibility for his own children? Suppose we continue the present policy of encouraging the least capable members of the human race to reproduce by giving them encouragement, welfare grants, and rewards for bearing more children? We will be crippling our own children with the genes that cause poverty, suffering, starvation, famine, physical and mental retardation. Clearly, the single measurable human characteristic most highly correlated with the ability to produce civilization is intelligence, and intelligence is determined 75% by inheritance and 25% by environment, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. It is mathematically impossible for any society, regardless of racial composition, to exist over time it it practices a social welfare program, unless it implements a eugenic program in conjunction with it. Over an infinite time frame, such a lysenkoist democratic tyranny must inevitably destroy itself because eventually there would be more people consuming goods than there would be people who had the ability to produce these goods, and the very people who we are trying to help would starve. Clearly, eugenics is a prerequisite for the existence of a technologically advanced society just as a wheel, a written language or a plow are. The right wing and the left wing are ready to blow the world up in a nuclear conflict between lysenkoist environmental determinist fairy tales like capitalism and communism, but adamantly refuse to take any action on a public health issue like eugenics which could directly improve the human condition without war.

The difference between the right wing and the eugenic movement is this: the right wing believes that our fundamental political and religious institutions are sound and will save us, whereas the eugenic movement believes that these institutions are corrupt; that they are the very cause of our problems and that they will destroy us. As I said in the "Eugenic Manifesto", "Our problems spring not from communist conspiracies, Jewish world plots, Illuminati, blacks or Bilderbergers, but rather from the very institutions that right wing conservative patriots are trying so desperately to protect and defend. Conservatives would have us believe that we can save civilization by simply allowing resegregation of the more "favored races" and less "favored races" or by returning to the ideas of fundamentalist religion and ancient political dogma like the Declaration of Independence." Actually, we could run our government and our society today with archaic aphorisms like "We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal", or "turn the other cheek" and "give all you have to the poor", just as easily as we could drive an 18th century carriage to the moon. Stopping immigration will not save us. The destruction of Jewish power and communism will not save us. Only the acceptance of the moral responsibility for the fate of our children and the destiny of the universe will save use and neither the right wing or the left wing is willing to do that.

We as a species suffer today because we have never accurately answered the ancient riddle of good and evil or the purpose of life.

Our history, philosophy, religion and politics reveal and astounding record of chaos and meaningless conflict; a whirlwind of anarchy without any ream meaning or understanding.

Today, as ever, the right wing and the left wing have not idea. They don't have a clue. Yet, we persist in pretending that the king's nakedness is the finest robe.

Take Pat Buchanan for example. I call him Patrick Bunker, you know, Archie Bunker's brother. I wouldn't call him conservative, rather stone age. He's the first one since Martha Washington who wants prayer returned to public schools and sex education back where it belongs, on the street corners. Pat says he is against birth control, family planning, and sex education. I guess we'll go back to having children like we used to, by accident. I wouldn't call him old fashioned, but the globe on his desk is flat. Pat's position on abortion is simple, you can't have one. Rape, incest, spina bifida–hey, you're just stuck. You see, like his contemporaries of 2,500 years ago and his friends in the Ku Ku Coalition, Pat thinks the world is flat and children are conceived by immaculate conception. Pat's positive that he is not being self righteous or narrow minded on this. Although other churchmen, philosophers, and sociologists have been debating the pros and cons of abortion for centuries, Pat has an advantage over all of them because of his intimate knowledge of the mind of God. You see, Pat is the only one I know of who has an autographed picture of God on his desk. And, according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, John...and Patrick, children are born by immaculate conception. Rape or incest not withstanding, the gospel according to Saint Patrick would have us believe that "Casper", the "holy ghost" comes down and picks one sperm out of millions and matches it alone with the egg and determines that the child will be born with downs syndrome, mental retardation, spina bifida and club foot and that it would be a sin against the "holy ghost..." for a parent to protect his children of the future generations from physical or mental defects by getting a eugenic abortion. If there were such a "holy ghost" that maimed and crippled our children of future generations, we wouldn't call it "God" but the "devil". Ridiculous as all this sounds, there are actually members of the bizarre "devil worship cult of Saint Patrick" who muck about murdering doctors at abortion clinics and mad bombers who blow up these institutions which probably have an altruistic and eugenic effect on future generations.

Because we are in eugenic movement understand that our problems come from the right wind and will not be solved by the right wing, we would never support Pat Buchanan despite his exemplary opposition to welfare, affirmative action, foreign aid, illegal immigration, promiscuity, etc. Because Gerhard Lauck, like the rest of the right wing, misunderstood the threat as coming from blacks, Mexicans, Jews, etc., rather than from our own archaic societal institutions, he like the rest of the misguided right wind supported Pat Buchanan in the presidential race. It is easy to understand that if any technologically advanced society declared a wheel, a written language, a plow, or mathematics to be sinful and refused to use these tools, that society would fail and the population, regardless of racial composition, would perish. In fact, the same thing would happen if a society followed Pat Buchanan's lead and declared eugenics "sinful" and reused to use it. It just takes longer. Our problems are cause by the conservative ideas that all men are created equal and on purpose by a holy ghost, and that it would be sinful to accept our moral responsibility to implement eugenic abortions and family planning to protect and improve the health and ability of future generations. It is these very conservative ideas themselves that have created the dysgenic disaster and genetic sewer in our inner cities. It Pat Buchanan were to gain power, the same dysgenic decline and destruction of the human race would continue apace until civilization itself utterly collapsed. It is little consolation that these genetically crippled animals, that our children would become, would be white Christians. It would be far better to have a multiracial society based on eugenics and evolutionary ethics which produced healthy children than to have a right wing lysenkoist democratic tyranny produced by the likes of Pat Buchanan where our children are all retarded basket cases covered with feces and urine who happen to also be white Christians. Such is the fate of our children if Pat Buchanan's barbaric, medieval opposition to eugenic abortion or opposition to family planning ever becomes national policy. The right wing shows pictures of aborted fetuses. I would like to show pictures of the retarded ward in a hospital. The indescribable anguish of seeing our children in such agony and knowing that a eugenic abortion could easily have converted this bundle of pain and torment into a beautiful, healthy child glowing with happiness and ability as he rides a bike or sets a path to the stars is unbearable to me. We must accept our moral responsibility to man and the universe to protect the right of future generations to be born physically healthy and mentally capable.

Eugenics is not cruel. On the contrary, it is the highest expression of concern and love for the children of the future. The suffering in this world is not caused solely by environment but partly by genetics. Thus, the cure for poverty, ignorance, or famine must involve genetic improvement. Poverty, ignorance and starvation can only be eradicated by removing the genetic and environmental combinations responsible for this human suffering. The cause of our suffering is within us. The source of our salvation is also within us.

<<     Index     >>